Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine, the Speed Triple S 2016 is equipped with a 1050cc inline three-cylinder engine, producing 140 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Street Triple 765 RS 2017 features a smaller 765cc inline three-cylinder engine, producing 123 horsepower and 77 Nm of torque. While the Speed Triple S has more power and torque, the Street Triple RS offers a wonderfully sporty engine with a throaty sound.

In terms of suspension, both models feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Street Triple RS offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments, compared to the Speed Triple S's compression and rebound adjustments. The rear suspension on both models consists of a monoshock, but the Street Triple RS has an Öhlins shock absorber, which offers more adjustability.

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

When it comes to the brakes, both models have double disk brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. However, the Street Triple RS has a slightly smaller diameter of 310mm compared to the Speed Triple S's 320mm. The Street Triple RS also features Brembo Monoblock technology, which provides excellent braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Street Triple RS has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1410mm compared to the Speed Triple S's 1435mm. Both models have the same front tire width of 120mm and diameter of 17 inches, but the Street Triple RS has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180mm compared to the Speed Triple S's 190mm. The Street Triple RS also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the Speed Triple S's 15.5 liters.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple S 2016 has a distinctive three-cylinder engine with a unique sound, a distinctive look, good brakes, a sporty seating position, and a well-functioning electronics package. On the other hand, the Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, ABS and traction control as standard (which can be switched off), cool looks, and a low weight.

As for weaknesses, the Speed Triple S 2016 could have a more responsive engine at the bottom end and somewhat sluggish handling. On the other hand, the Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has complicated menu navigation.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple S offers more power and torque, while the Street Triple RS provides a sportier engine and better adjustability in terms of suspension. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power140 HPEngine power123 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,850 rpmRpm at Torque10,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.65
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandShowa
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
BrandBrandNissinBrandBrembo

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

The Speed Triple remains true to its line in the latest generation - a wonderfully sharp naked bike that characterises the streetfighter style like hardly any other model. It only makes limited sense for the racetrack - of course, the roaring three-cylinder engine with 140 hp is enormous fun and the Fafhrwerk shows no gross weaknesses, but there is a Speed Triple R with Öhlins suspension elements that naturally feels more at home on the racetrack. All in all, the Speed Triple S is an excellent country road fighter that also has a lot to offer in terms of looks.

Three-cylinder engine with distinctive sound

distinctive look

good brakes

sporty seating position

well-functioning electronics package.

Engine could be more responsive at the bottom end

somewhat sluggish handling

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple S vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 93 days for the Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple S was published on 10/23/2011 and now has more than 10,300 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.

Price Triumph Speed Triple S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen