Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs. BMW F 800 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs BMW F 800 R 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2021 and the BMW F 800 R 2017 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 comes out on top with its 125.4 HP engine, while the BMW F 800 R 2017 falls slightly behind with its 90 HP engine. The Z900 also boasts a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the F 800 R's 86 Nm. This means that the Z900 offers more power and acceleration, making it a more exhilarating ride.

Both bikes feature an inline engine type and a liquid cooling system, ensuring optimal performance and temperature control. They also have fuel injection systems, providing efficient fuel delivery for enhanced performance and fuel economy.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and swing arm suspensions in the rear. This ensures a smooth and controlled ride, absorbing bumps and providing stability. However, the BMW F 800 R 2017 has the added advantage of electronically adjustable suspension, allowing riders to customize their riding experience.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

When it comes to the chassis, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 features a steel frame, while the BMW F 800 R 2017 utilizes an aluminum frame. The steel frame of the Z900 offers durability and strength, while the aluminum frame of the F 800 R provides a lightweight and agile feel.

Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with four pistons, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power. However, the BMW F 800 R 2017 has the advantage of radial brake technology, which provides improved braking performance and control.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 offers ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The BMW F 800 R 2017, on the other hand, only offers electronically adjustable suspension as an advanced rider assistance system. This gives the Z900 an edge in terms of safety and technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW F 800 R 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. The seat height of the F 800 R is also slightly lower, ranging from 790 to 820 mm, while the Z900 has a seat height of 795 mm.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 offers a powerful four-cylinder engine, intuitive handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R 2017 boasts strong brakes, upgraded equipment, low weight, accessible geometry, and a characteristic sound.

However, the Z900 does have a few weaknesses. It does not offer a quickshifter option, which some riders may find disappointing. Additionally, some of its competitors offer more advanced features such as a 6-axis IMU, putting the Z900 slightly behind in terms of electronic advancements.

Similarly, the BMW F 800 R 2017 has a few weaknesses. It can be considered somewhat pragmatic, lacking some of the flashy features and aggressive styling of its competitors. Additionally, some riders may find that it lacks a bit of excitement compared to other bikes in its class.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 and the BMW F 800 R 2017 are both capable naked bikes, but they have distinct differences in terms of performance, features, and overall riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2021 compared to BMW F 800 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2021
BMW F 800 R 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z900 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2021
BMW F 800 R 2017
BMW F 800 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power90 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.02
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,145 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth860 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,235 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height790,770,820 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.

powerful four-cylinder

intuitive handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

No quickshifter option

competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

With a EURO4 engine, new riding modes, new instruments and new colours, the F 800 R starts the new season. It is recognisable at first glance only by the end cap on the stately stainless steel exhaust. It is one of those full-grown motorbikes that, despite its considerable sporting potential, was designed for the widest possible user group. Therefore, it is absolutely beginner-friendly (throttled), but can also inspire an experienced audience. Its character remains somewhat pragmatic, but the unmistakable, hollow sound of the inline two compensates for this.

strong brakes

upgraded equipment

low weight

accessible geometry

characteristic sound

somewhat pragmatic

effervescence is a little lacking

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs BMW F 800 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2021 and a BMW F 800 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2021 is about 17% higher. Compared to BMW F 800 R 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 33 compared to 16. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 800 R with 105 days compared to 107 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 8,900 views for the first review on BMW F 800 R published on 10/10/2008.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AGContinental Motorradreifen