BMW F 800 R 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 R 2017 vs Kawasaki Z650 2017

The BMW F 800 R 2017 and the Kawasaki Z650 2017 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several differences between the two models that make them unique in their own way.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both bikes have an in-line engine configuration and fuel injection systems. The BMW F 800 R has a more powerful engine with 90 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 68.2 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 86 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 65.7 Nm. In terms of displacement, the BMW has a slightly larger engine at 798 ccm compared to the Kawasaki's 649 ccm.

Moving on to the suspension, the BMW F 800 R features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the Kawasaki Z650 has a regular telescopic fork. Both bikes have swing arm suspensions at the rear. The BMW's suspension is electronically adjustable, providing advanced rider assistance systems. This feature is not present in the Kawasaki Z650.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

In terms of chassis, the BMW F 800 R has an aluminum frame, whereas the Kawasaki Z650 has a steel frame. The BMW's frame type is a twin tube, load-bearing engine, while the Kawasaki's frame type is tubular. These differences in frame material and type can affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. However, the BMW F 800 R has four-piston calipers and radial technology, while the Kawasaki Z650 has double-piston calipers and petal technology. The BMW's brakes are known for their strong performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 800 R has a wider front tire at 120 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 120 mm. Both bikes have the same front and rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The BMW has a wider rear tire at 180 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 160 mm. The BMW also has a longer wheelbase at 1520 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1410 mm. The seat height of the BMW is adjustable between 790-820 mm, while the Kawasaki has a fixed seat height of 790 mm. The BMW F 800 R is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 202 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 185 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 800 R has strong brakes, upgraded equipment, low weight, accessible geometry, and a characteristic sound. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 offers even power delivery, a sporty chassis, compact dimensions, and a negative display.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 800 R is somewhat pragmatic and lacks a bit of effervescence. The Kawasaki Z650 may be a little too small for tall people.

Overall, both the BMW F 800 R 2017 and the Kawasaki Z650 2017 have their own unique features and strengths. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017
Kawasaki Z650 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW F 800 R 2017
BMW F 800 R 2017
Kawasaki Z650 2017
Kawasaki Z650 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore82 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power90 HPEngine power68.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque65.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,800 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.02 Compression Ratio10.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustableAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,145 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,520 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790,770,820 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight202 kgKerb Weight185 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

With a EURO4 engine, new riding modes, new instruments and new colours, the F 800 R starts the new season. It is recognisable at first glance only by the end cap on the stately stainless steel exhaust. It is one of those full-grown motorbikes that, despite its considerable sporting potential, was designed for the widest possible user group. Therefore, it is absolutely beginner-friendly (throttled), but can also inspire an experienced audience. Its character remains somewhat pragmatic, but the unmistakable, hollow sound of the inline two compensates for this.

strong brakes

upgraded equipment

low weight

accessible geometry

characteristic sound

somewhat pragmatic

effervescence is a little lacking

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

The Kawasaki Z 650 is the tip of the middle class for small male and female riders. On its compact dimensions, you probably won't feel comfortable as a giant. Heart-warming feelings, however, come from the engine, which delights with a very smooth pull. On the chassis side, a Kawasaki-typical tight set-up was chosen, which finds a great compromise in everyday use. The negative display is very easy to read and is reminiscent of its predecessor, the ER-6n - very nice!

Even power delivery

sporty chassis

compact dimensions

negative display

a little too small for tall people

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2017 and a Kawasaki Z650 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW F 800 R 2017 is about 24% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z650 2017 there are more BMW F 800 R 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 16 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z650 with 76 days compared to 105 days for the BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth